Sample Types and CIR Challenges in the NTC Scenario
(a) illustrates examples of “Clean Sample”, “Partial Match Sample” and “Hard Noisy Sample” within the
NTC scenario. (b)
illustrates the three challenges that current CIR methods face in the NTC scenario, including (b1)
Modality Suppression,
(b2) Negative Anchor Deficiency, and (b3) Unlearning Backlash.
The proposed ConeSep consists of three primary modules: (a) Geometric Fidelity Quantization, (b) Negative
Boundary
Learning, and (c) Boundary-based Targeted Unlearning. In (a), we visualize the similarity cone effect, where
the x and y
axes denote the similarity scores of clean samples and NTC samples, respectively, and the z axis shows the
frequency
distribution of these similarity values. The light green region in the figure forms a distinctly cone-shaped
space.
Experiment
Performance comparison on the FashionIQ validation set in terms of R@K(%). The best and sub-optimal results
are
highlighted in bold and underline, respectively.
Performance comparison on the CIRR test set in terms of R@K(%) and Rsub@K(%). The best and second-best
results are
highlighted in bold and underline, respectively.
Ablation study on FashionIQ and CIRR datasets.
Sensitivity to (a) Fidelity threshold ω and (b) κ of ℒul .